Wednesday, February 21, 2007



Spy vs. Spy



















It should be quite clear that capitalism has no interest in becoming socialism, capitalism created socialism on Wall Street at the turn of the last century as a means of dividing and colonizing Russia and putting an end to the Old Regime while advancing the cause of the common people through industrialization via Bolshevism. Some of that by default has caught on in America. But, it was never intended for America. Capitalism is the "machine" (Lenin) which serves for an ever expanding realm where earnings and profits are the yin and yang of the organism no matter how much anyone believes the world would fare better under a totalitarian socialist dictatorship. The truth of the matter is that the spectacles on our noses, the cars we drive, the medical technology that stretches out the lives of our parents, the laptops we use to organize our data, the batteries that powers them, the wireless systems we enjoy which frees our bodies and hands and makes us mobile, the airplanes we gladly use to reduce a two week journey to six hours are all highly refined functions of our present capitalist society. We live in a state of law and order which provides education for our children, and is opposed to placing them in harms way, equality for women, and civil rights to all races, and creeds. During the eighties and nineties however such progress made it possible for certain profile types to emerge. This information has been well documented and studied. These profile types are considered sociopathic with an intense need for public recognition. I’ve run into a few in my day; nearly took me out. This profile is often highly educated, clean and meticulous about details, some say obsessive compulsive. Unfortunately their psychological condition leads them to becoming zealots for a cause that permits them a rationale to become violent. The only difference between them and us, some say, is that we got here first and are in uniform. One certainly wonders about the profiles of Robert S. McNamarra, or Donald Rumsfeld. Nevertheless, the prognosis for dealing with the growing problem of the past two decades has been rather than to agree with what this terrorists wish to communicate and express and to mend our wicked ways, instead, we remove any reward or payback that drives the terrorist like big opportunities that generate big media and press. This they crave. The idea that there is no lawyer, courts, etc., ... only eternal arrest, sick tortures and painful death with no recourse to nothin’ including sleep has effectively terrorized the terrorist and curtailed a great deal of the widespread terrorism of recent years because the true terrorist profile is looking for work elsewhere unless, of course, you happen to be V. The US at this point is the only, and probably the last terror the world will ever need to face in the age to come. As far as freedom and liberty is concerned, most people, I am convinced, have little idea what these terms actually mean much less enjoy them. We are a nation of consuming slaves, addicted, vulgar and in bondage to every form of vanity imaginable. I think we lost our freedom somewhere between Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt. The United States has no desire to remove anyone’s freedom but wishes to elevate everyone to the same level of security, isolation, secrecy, and intrigue that is practiced in the highest level of government even the Oval Office. Why are folks complaining? Everyone demands their privacy? —Wildfeather

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home